Freedom at Midnight
Till date I never read a book consecutively twice. But I had to; in this case. When I completed reading the book first time I was too lost in facts to miss the emotions. I felt hatred, devotion, anger and a confused feeling towards British, Indian Leaders, Mohammed Ali Jinnah and Gandhi in that order. I was surprised how little I knew about my mother land.
The Empire was 'heavy with gold, black with industrial soot, and red with the blood of conquest.' Collins and Lapierre open the book on New Year's Day, 1947 -- London awakes to filth of its own country. The reader is taken on a journey of significant events that lead to the independence of India. On the way you will be introduced to many brilliant characters that shaped the history of India and have left a mark that is still evident.
The authors’ attempt to justify everything done by the British Indian Empire by concealing the atrocities brought about by them during their so-called Raj in India. Collins and Lapierre skip over the virtues of Indian masses, their accomplishments and virtually anything besides the facts such as their squatting habits, religious extremisms, being ignorant, illiterate and incompetent. One who may be unable to objectively read this book would be left with a great impression of the Englishmen and especially Louis Mountbatten. As a result the reader may develop distaste towards Gandhi and his principles.
The flow of the book is like reading an epic. The book gives the most intimate accounts of the most venerated figures in the world's history, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi aka Mahatma Gandhi, his approach, position, attitude towards the British Raj, the Indian Congress, the political and social blueprint that he dreamed of the Independent India. It gives detailed account of final days of Gandhi and who, why and how of the assassination of this revered leader. His murder as Bernad Shaw said, “Shows how dangerous it is to be good”.
Sir Cyril Radcliffe’s vivisection of Punjab was the cruelest act. His pencil strokes changed lives of many Indians and claimed thousands of lives. Going through the difficulties the people suffered; the worst that happened was the train laden with corpses reaching Amritsar saying “This train is our Independence gift to Nehru and Patel".
To end up; I belong to those set of persons who admire Gandhi. But then after reading this book I felt certain things could have been avoided or taken up in a better way by a human whose voice had the power to move the whole nation. “No one is perfect "and that includes Gandhi too. But still I remain the most ardent and devoted admirer of Gandhi.
The Empire was 'heavy with gold, black with industrial soot, and red with the blood of conquest.' Collins and Lapierre open the book on New Year's Day, 1947 -- London awakes to filth of its own country. The reader is taken on a journey of significant events that lead to the independence of India. On the way you will be introduced to many brilliant characters that shaped the history of India and have left a mark that is still evident.
The authors’ attempt to justify everything done by the British Indian Empire by concealing the atrocities brought about by them during their so-called Raj in India. Collins and Lapierre skip over the virtues of Indian masses, their accomplishments and virtually anything besides the facts such as their squatting habits, religious extremisms, being ignorant, illiterate and incompetent. One who may be unable to objectively read this book would be left with a great impression of the Englishmen and especially Louis Mountbatten. As a result the reader may develop distaste towards Gandhi and his principles.
The flow of the book is like reading an epic. The book gives the most intimate accounts of the most venerated figures in the world's history, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi aka Mahatma Gandhi, his approach, position, attitude towards the British Raj, the Indian Congress, the political and social blueprint that he dreamed of the Independent India. It gives detailed account of final days of Gandhi and who, why and how of the assassination of this revered leader. His murder as Bernad Shaw said, “Shows how dangerous it is to be good”.
Sir Cyril Radcliffe’s vivisection of Punjab was the cruelest act. His pencil strokes changed lives of many Indians and claimed thousands of lives. Going through the difficulties the people suffered; the worst that happened was the train laden with corpses reaching Amritsar saying “This train is our Independence gift to Nehru and Patel".
To end up; I belong to those set of persons who admire Gandhi. But then after reading this book I felt certain things could have been avoided or taken up in a better way by a human whose voice had the power to move the whole nation. “No one is perfect "and that includes Gandhi too. But still I remain the most ardent and devoted admirer of Gandhi.
Comments
Nice blog,by the way.
the partition might hav been brutal, but thank god... better to have those terrorists as neighbours than in our own household...
U won't say that if u read that book....Too horrible was the count of deaths...The terrorists were formed in the name of Jihad for getting kashmir to their state. So if the partition was avoided then why terrorists?????
Thanks for visiting my blog...Do keep visiting :-)
@gils
I find many going with her thoughts....Thnks for visiting my blog and Keep visiting
chk out www.cia.gov and i'm sure u'll hav sthg surprising there too...
Good post and so u have started loving india more..
To add some more points, there are some grave mistakes done by the so called gandhians..
1. Nehru shud not have become the PM
2. Gandhi shud not have agreed to Jinnah
3. Nehru shud not have raised Kashmir in the UN
but then these became the most costliest mistakes ever done...
Also a from my experience India is the most free country than any country in the world.. It is my personal experience and I love India just for that..
Danks...
@Bricktop
Hmmmm...Unga points are worth noticing...
@Syam
Naangalum mittai vangarathoda seri..Ipo enna post podarathu nu theriyala thaan unga policy follow pannen :-)
And nice blog :)
Any historical book will be subjective na for history is often written by the victors. No wonder u shud have been annoyed the british raj, rulers etc and the author when he tried to justify their actions
But we dont protest as loudly as China does when some crap is written about the japp invasion on china , world war etc when incorrect facts are written about our country.
Abt the Kashmir issue, we also played some game. There is no doubt on it. Every country have to play that kind of game. We also did. But becoz of Nehrus wrong foreign policies we brought this issue to UN. Thats the biggest mistake was done by Nehru. Still we are paying for that.
We cant blame Jinnah for the Partication. Its happened becoz of English prinicple "Divide & Rule". But Gandhi failed to convince Jinnah and Nehru at that time.
And also they played a very dirty game with Nethaji disapperance. Gandhi didnt say anything abt this issue.
But we have to salute Mr. Patel for his iron arms for bringing all the states under one flag.
Pakistan know that they cant win India in front. And also they wounded very badly by the separation of....... illa vendam.,
madapathil thaniya ninnu pulampura mathri irruku. athunalla ethoda nirutikiren.... Janani, ungaluku tamil padiki theriyuma, thericha, intha page poi poruga, nam nattai pathi solvathu ellam ethu than.
Thats true..But when I read something that brings disgrace to our motherland the protest comes out automatically....
@gils
Muttai le irukeengale..Konjam perusa yosingapa
@நாகை சிவா
British started the 'Divide & Rule policy'. But Jinnah added flavor to it and we lost senses to follow the british's cunning policy....
Tamil padika theriyum..but thats a slow process but still padichen..Unga post superba irundhudu...Great..
ஆனால், இங்கு பலருக்கு காஷ்மீர் விஷயத்தை பற்றி முழுமையாக தெரியாது என்றே நான் நிணைகிறேன்.
இந்தியா சுதந்திரம் பெற்ற போது இந்தியா, பாகிஸ்தான், காஷ்மீர் என மூன்றாகவே பிரிந்தது. இஸ்லாமியர்களை அதிகம் கொண்டு, ஹரி சிங் என்ற ஒரு ஹிந்து மன்னனால் ஆட்சி செய்ய பட்டது தானே காஷ்மேர். பின்னர், பாக்கிஸ்தான் காஸ்மீர் மீது படை எடுத்து ஆக்ரமிப்பு செய்ய பட்ட போது, மன்னன் ஹரி சிங் இந்தியாவிடம் அடைகலம் அடைந்து, இந்தியாவிடம் ஒப்படைத்த போது தான், காஷ்மீர், இந்தியாவின் பகுதியானது.
இந்த சூழலில், இராணுவ ரீதியாக தீர்வுகான நினைத்திருந்தால், பிறர் மண்ணின் மீது படையெடுக்காத ஒரே நாடு என்ற பேரை நாம் இழந்திருப்போம்.
இந்தியாவின் வெளியுறவு கொள்கை என்றுமே தவறானதாகவே இருந்துள்ளது. இந்தியாவை சுற்றி எந்த நாட்டுடனும் சுமூகமான உறவு இல்லை. இரு புறம் சீனா, மறுபுறம் பாக்கிஸ்தான் என இரு பெரிய தலைவழி என்றிருக்க, வங்கதேசம், நேப்பாலிடம் கூட ஒரு இனக்கமான உறவு இல்லை. வடக்கில் தான் அப்படி என்றால், தெற்கிலும் அதே நிலை தான். வாரம் இருமுறையாவது, இலங்கை இராணுவத்தினர் தமிழக மீனவரை தாக்கி கொண்டுள்ளது.
---
அது போல் இங்கு பலர், நேருவை வசை பாடுவதையே முதல் கடமையாக கொண்டுள்ளனர், அன்றைய சூழலில் இவரை தவிற சர்தார் வல்லபாய் படேல் போல வெகுசிலரே இருந்தனர். அவரை காந்தி ஏன் பிரதமராக தேர்வு செய்தார் என்பதை இங்கு காணவும்.
பில்லியன் டாலர் கனவுகள்